Most Download

Published in last 1 year | In last 2 years| In last 3 years| All| Most Downloaded in Recent Month | Most Downloaded in Recent Year|

Most Downloaded in Recent Year
Please wait a minute...
For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
2022, 10 (4): 301-308. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2022.04.003
Abstract263)      PDF (741KB)(897)      
2022, 10 (4): 289-294. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2022.04.001
Abstract185)      PDF (976KB)(591)      
2022, 10 (2): 146-146. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2022.02.010
Abstract278)      PDF (684KB)(594)      
2020, 8 (3): 237-242. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2020.03.019
Abstract74)      PDF (747KB)(234)      
2024, 12 (3): 271-275. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2024.03.019
Abstract56)      PDF (919KB)(106)      
2022, 10 (2): 183-188. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2022.02.019
Abstract70)      PDF (720KB)(245)      
2025, 13 (2): 97-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2025.02.001
Abstract73)      PDF (940KB)(58)      
2025, 13 (1): 1-6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2025.01.001
Abstract49)      PDF (1006KB)(52)      
2020, 8 (5): 337-341. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2020.05.003
Abstract108)      PDF (2013KB)(217)      
2025, 13 (2): 103-108. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2025.02.002
Abstract54)      PDF (915KB)(48)      

Analysis of risk factors for recurrent pneumonia in elderly kidney transplant recipients after surgery 

Liu Yanzhong , Li Chao , Dong Hongmei , Chen Changqing .
2025, 13 (1): 7-11. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2025.01.002
Abstract56)      PDF (720KB)(26)      

Objective To explore the risk factors for recurrent ≥ 2 times) pneumonia in elderlykidney transplant recipients after surgery. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed from the clinical data of 119 elderly kidney transplant recipients who underwent kidney transplantation at the Eighth Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital from January 2010 to January 2024. According to whether pneumonia occurs repeatedly (≥ 2 times) after kidney transplantation, elderly recipients were divided into two groups, with 11 cases in the recurrent pneumonia group and 108 cases in the non-recurrent pneumonia group. Relevant clinical data were compared between the two groups, including the general basic information of the recipient (gender, age, height, weight, smoking history,etc.), as well as the relevant clinical data (the time of dialysis before kidney transplantation, the maintenance treatment plan of immunosuppressant after surgery, whether there was delayed recovery of kidney function after transplantation, whether there was a decrease in white blood cells after transplantation, serum creatinine level at discharge, whether there was diabetes before and after surgery, and whether there was viral hepatitis B infection, etc.). We conducted univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis to explore the risk factors for recurrent pneumonia in elderly kidneytransplant recipients after surgery. Results The incidence of recurrent pneumonia in elderly kidney transplant recipientsafter surgery was 9.24% (11/119), and one patient in the case group died from severe pneumonia, with a mortality rate of 9.1% (1/11). Smoking history (OR = 13.15,95% CI = 2.406 ~ 71.91,P = 0.003) and postoperative leukopenia (OR = 6.050,95% CI = 1.248 ~ 29.32,P = 0.025) were risk factors for recurrent pneumonia in elderly kidney transplant recipients. Conclusion Smoking history and postoperative leukopenia increase the risk of recurrent pneumonia in elderly kidney transplant recipients. So we should strengthen postoperative health education for elderly kidney transplant recipients, encourage smoking cessation, and prevent and treat postoperative leukopenia. 

2015, 3 (2): 79-81.
Abstract51)      PDF (641KB)(274)      
2021, 9 (2): 89-94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2021.02.001
Abstract80)      PDF (735KB)(69)      
2024, 12 (5): 388-389. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2024.05.002
Abstract34)      PDF (910KB)(41)      
2018, 6 (5): 409-411. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2018.05.017
Abstract69)      PDF (1613KB)(178)      
2024, 12 (5): 470-476. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2024.05.020
Abstract28)      PDF (734KB)(39)      
2015, 3 (5): 300-306.
Abstract48)      PDF (3357KB)(194)      
2024, 12 (5): 385-387. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2024.05.001
Abstract46)      PDF (931KB)(39)      

Protective effect of ursolic acid on hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice by regulating PTGS2 

Hou Wen, Lu Jiansen, Zuo Huaiwen, Liu Hongsheng.
2022, 10 (4): 353-359. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2022.04.012
Abstract149)      PDF (2218KB)(134)      

Objective To explore the effect and preliminary mechanism of plant extract ursolic acid(UA)inreducing hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury(HIRI). Methods C57 male mice were divided into sham operation group,sham operation +UA group,HIRI group,HIRI low-dose group and HIRI high-dose group. The analysis and validationwere carried out by methods such as animal experiments,network pharmacology and molecular biology. Results Animal experiments showed that UA significantly reduced the activities of AST and ALT in serum of HIRI mice. Target genescorresponding to HIRI and ursolic acid were obtained by TCMSP,Pharm Mapper,Swiss Target Prediction,GeneCards and other databases,and key target genes were obtained by DAVID,STRING and Cytoscape. They were PPARG (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma,PPARG),

MAPK3(mitogen-activated protein kinase 3,MAPK3 and PTGS2(prostaglandin G/H synthase 2,PTGS2). Finally,PTGS2 was identified as the hub target gene in this study according to the molecular docking score and the number of hydrogen bonds binding between receptor and ligand. Compared with Sham operation group,PTGS2 was highly expressed in HIRI group(P 0.01). Compared with HIRI group,the expression of PTGS2 in HIRI + LUA and HIRI + HUA groups was significantly decreased (P < 0.01). Conclusion UA can regulate the protective effect of PTGS2 on hepatic ischemia reperfusion injuryin mice. Thisstudy providesa reference for clinical development of new drugsto interveneHIRI.

2020, 8 (4): 313-317. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5332.2020.04.021
Abstract57)      PDF (709KB)(194)